Homewood Takes Next Step Towards Casino
Homewood is one step closer towards developing a casino, but village officials say there's still a long way to go.
Homewood trustees voted Tuesday night to take the next step towards developing a casino along with the Village of East Hazel Crest.
Two agenda items now help to set the stage for a potential future casino development. The first is an intergovernmental revenue sharing agreement between Homewood and the Village of East Hazel Crest. As the larger property holder, East Hazel Crest will be receiving 55 percent of proceeds, leaving Homewood with the remaining 45 percent.
Trustees also voted to hire law firm Barnes & Thornburg to solicit interest from casino businesses. Homewood Village President Richard Hofeld says the firm employs statisticians and financial analysts to determine the best, most profitable choice for the villages. This is a favorable means to partner with a casino for proposal, he says.
Homewood agreed to spend no more than $135,000 for legal fees. East Hazel Crest is expected to agree to a slightly higher spending cap. Should the villages decide to partner with a casino, the casino will reimburse both governments for 100 percent of the legal costs incurred, regardless of whether the project succeeds or fails.
Just the first step ...
The reality of a local casino is still a long way off, however, and trustees want residents to know their opinion counts.
“I think there’s a lot of concern that we’re trying to get this run through without having any public input,” said Trustee Tom Kataras. “We’re going to have public hearings. This is not a slam-dunk thing."
Village President Richard Hofeld says the village started thinking about a potential casino over two years ago when both Homewood and East Hazel Crest were looking for options to develop the land just southwest of I-294 and Halsted Street. Land developers told the village no large-scale retail stores were suitable for the location, Hofeld said—but a casino is.
Trustee Anne Colton helped to clarified the board’s current position for residents who may be off-put by the news.
“What we have to do is, we have to examine every possibility. We have to examine every opportunity that we have as a village to maintain and preserve our community,” Colton said. “So that’s what we’re doing right now. We’re just looking and we’re definitely going to have informational sessions within the next month or two.”
The aforementioned meeting will be held sometime in December, according to Hofeld. Both law firm Barnes & Thornburg and lobbyists will be present to answer questions, he says.
Perhaps the most pressing issue, though, is that there is not yet a South Suburban casino license available. But that’s not dissuading Hofeld.
“We’ve been told that this is a very opportune time for the legislation to pass in the veto session,” he said.
Should legislation pass and a license becomes available, there are still other obstacles, such as other proposals for South Suburban casinos. In the case of Country Club Hills, their proposal partner Cannery Casino, has already responded to Homewood’s casino announcement—claiming that Country Club Hills remains the ideal location for a casino. Not so, says Hofeld.
“I’m sure everyone feels that they have the best game in town, we know we have the best,” he said.
Stay in the know on all things casino. Sign up for our daily email newsletter.
Jan Mauer
6:36 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Are they trying to take the "home" out of Homewood?
Dinkum
12:25 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
No, they are trying to replace the run-down hotel out of Homewood. Does anyone seriously believe a casino business located right off 1-294 will negatively impact the residential quality of life? What research do you have that supports this belief?
Sharon Luckett
6:46 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I agree with J.M. This is HOMEWOOD, not VEGASWOOD. They can research their options and I'll research mine.
Beth
7:32 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Does this mean that if a casino doesn't work that something else could go in the larger shared space. I'm leaning against a casino option but like the idea of putting something there.
WA Mama
8:27 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Did any of the trustees vote against it?
Ryan Fitzpatrick
2:13 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
No.
babyboomer
8:46 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
This is not what we need in this area!! There are already a lot of bad elements coming over to the stores, K-mart and Kohls are getting robbed all the time. I hope all of the decent residents in these communities will voice their opinions against this. Hofeld is always trying to pull the wool over our eyes with his shady schemes.
Jim Gannon
9:43 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Babyboomer, I believe you are mistaken about "bad elements" and "K-Mart and Kohls getting robbed all the time" you better get your information correct and check with the police for statistics. There is not robberies all the time! Shoplifting is more the noteable crime. The police have an excellent patrol program and they are quite visible to shoppers. A casino is not a shaddy scheme, it is an opportunity for additional revenue that will help support services to Homewood residents and visitors.
lala
5:04 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Define "bad element".
babyboomer
8:48 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
What I would like to know, is how much money are they going to waste "researching this", and how much of a kickback is Hofeld getting?
Dinkum
12:11 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Baby, you need to watch the unfounded accusations. The kickback reference is close to slander and you may find yourself in court.
Contribute something meaningful to the discussion or keep your comments to yourself.
Ryan Fitzpatrick
2:16 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
As mentioned above, the village agreed last night to hire a law firm to take care of determining the best course of action. They agreed to spend no more than $135,000 with the understanding that the casino will reimburse them for 100 percent of it should and when they partner up for proposal.
jazzaddic
7:35 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Babyboomer,I hope you have proof that Hofeld is getting a "kickback". This statement borders on slander. You need to get a life with all your insinuations. If anything Hofeld has contributed to the tax revenue in Homewood thru his success in the Halsted street corridor, not one of his "shady deals" as you eluded to.
TG
9:35 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
They all voted for it. I went to the meeting with an anti-casino sign, expecting a lot of my fellow Patch people who commented against the casino to be there, but there were only a handlful of people in the audience who might have been there to hear about the casino (based on who was still there when that came up). They claim they are going to have public hearings. Everyone who opposes this needs to actually get to the meetings and make it clear to the powers that be that we do not want this in our community.
Jim Gannon
9:54 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Comments, comments, comments! We all have something to say. This is a topic that will open the doors to lots of discussion. Really, in today's struggling economy a casino would certainly help the bottom line for any municipality. How fortunate it would be for Homewood and East Hazel Crest to share the next casino license. It you don't like the idea of a casino then don't participate in casino gaming. Simple solution. I would think the overwhelming majority of participants will come from outside the Homewood or East Hazel Crest villages. When it comes down to it...Gov. Quinn will have the final word. Good Luck to both sides of this lively topic!
Sadb
10:02 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
If i want entertainment i can go to the bowling alley on 183rd st and either get robbed or beat up in the parking lot or buy an assortmemt of drugs there, Homewoods not the same town i knew years ago, just talk a look at the downtown area with the empty buildings or all the foreclosed houses, kinda reminds me of Roseland last time i was there driving down the Ave, let Country Club Hills have the casino with all the crime thats going to come with it, take the $135.000 for legal fees and spend it on cleaning up the town!!!
Jim Gannon
12:03 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Again, not having the facts leads to inaccurate information. Just how many people in the past 6 months have been robbed and beat up? Let me know... Oh, check with Des Plaines to find out how much crime has increased. Also, how much revenue has helped Des Plaines.
Dinkum
12:30 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
From my view it's people like you that ruin fine communities like Homewood. Making statements without facts, spreading fear, talking like you've had one too many beers.
If you believe half the things you have written, get involved with changing them. Or move out.
Tobias Cichon
10:05 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I see the arguments for a casino, but the detractors don't seem to be offering much. Why not have a casino? What exactly is the fear? Casinos have been popping up all over the country in smaller community areas, surely there are studies that would affirm (or dissuade) whatever the arguments against it are. Anyone?
Dinkum
12:32 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
To your point TC, let's look at the facts around casinos and their impact. Plenty of data exists around this topic IF people are willing to dig a bit.
Tobias Cichon
9:41 am on Friday, November 30, 2012
Fair, Dinkum. To that end...
"Will gambling bring increases in crime? Study after study shows there is no correlation between legalized gaming and an increase in crime rates. The National Gambling Impact Study Commission, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences and the University of Chicago National Research Council all came to this same conclusion. The Governmental Accounting Office (GAO) also reports there is no link between video gaming and an increase in crime rates, social problems or bankruptcy."
Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2012/10/20/2367188/pro-industry-is-regulated-wont.html#storylink=cpy
Jessie Cunningham
10:22 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
This is a note to the Mayor and Trustees of the Village of Homewood: I am very disappointed in the action you took on Tuesday night to pursue talks to bring a casino to Homewood. The citizens of this village have on numerous occasions let you know that we are not interested in bringing gambling to Homewood. Your opinion that you have to look at ways to bring in new revenue streams is not acceptable. For the life of me I can not understand why elected officials believe gambling will solve their budget problems, it won't. The only people who make money are the operators of the machines or casino. We are a family community, many of us believe a casino will change the character of our home town in ways that are unacceptable. We will attend your public hearings, in fact we will pack them. You may want to reserve a larger room than the council chambers. But more important, we will remember on election day that you are out of touch with what we want and it is time for you to go. Never underestimate the power of an empowered electorate. Is it too late to get on the ballot for the spring election?
Anonymous
11:00 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
The problem is the crime rate increases, as well as, vehicular accidents. The more alcohol served, the more risk for accidents. I-80 is notorious for accidents especially in the winter months. Halsted is a busier street & just a little further down the street are more bars & gentlemen's clubs that already have problems with crime. I don't have a problem with casinos, bars or gentlemen's clubs, but you might as well put a bullseye over that location for problems. They will be on top of each other. The busline is all the way down Halsted, as well, more people in an area losing & winning money is like sitting on a live grenade. How much money will be spent on security? Enough to keep everyone safe & allow them to have a good time or the bare minimum? Has everyone forgotten about Homewood Days & how it has changed so much because of crime? Home Sweet Homewood can bid on other things. Let Country Club Hills have the casino (the location is more contained) & let Homewood and East Hazel Crest have the outlet mall. The sales tax will generate money. Add a movie theater and there's more money.
Dinkum
12:40 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
This could be true of any new business. What data do you have that supports how casinos create more crime issues than any other type of business?
There is always some downside to economic expansion. But let's be sure we are dealing with facts, not just someone's opinion.
Blackhawks Fan
11:00 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
In 1996 Hofeld and the board voted against revenue sharing of casinos in the Chicago area, at the time I thought that was a huge mistake. They also didn’t jump on board in 2010 when there was talk of another casino going up in the south suburbs. Is Homewood part of the revenue sharing of Rivers Casino in Des Plaines or did we turn that down too?
I’m curious as to why they think gaming is a good idea now and what was their reasoning back then.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-03-01/news/9603010207_1_gaming-rosemont-capita-amount
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/illinois/south-suburban-mayors-consider-casino-revenue-sharing-agreement/article_094fc473-a492-50d7-bf7b-c270dca16df7.html
Dinkum
12:16 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Did you attend the meeting and ask them?
John Kearns
11:01 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Hi everybody! Lets talk about the benifits. How about the millions of dollars being spent by Illinois residents going to Indiana. The tax dollars that wiilll benifit residential services of police and fire as well as schools. 500 to 1000 jobs that will hopefully have a preference for residents of both East Hazel Crest and Homewood. My preference is an entire entertainment complex with a theatre, hotels and resturants, Specialty stores and finaly a casino. People traveling will now have a reason to get off in East Hazel Crest and Homewood exit and visit nearby gas services resturants and retail stores. We have without a dought the absolute best location to draw those people that are now going to Indiana. These patrons will have little impact on the residential portions of both towns. We also have the advantage of a public transit with the IC elecric line nearby. People staying in Chicago could hop on a train and be here in 35 minutes. A shuttle could be set up from the train depots of both towns.
June Whitehand
12:14 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I wish people would 1) actually read the article they are commenting on 2) have informed opinions. One of the things that has kept me in the H/F area is the number of intelligent people who care deeply about this community.
Everyone's opinion should be heard at the public hearings, but please don't arrive and waste everyone's time spouting nonsense!
Dinkum
2:52 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
With you here June. But then again, if people had informed opinions (based on fact or research), MIA Jackson would not have been re-elected.
I disagree everyone's opinion should be heard. Everyone's logical argument should be heard and if they are unable to grasp presentation basics (what is true such as facts, consider the facts, and suggest a course of action) they remain silent. Most of us learned how to do this in elementary school, yes?
babyboomer
5:37 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Oh, I see, if someone doesn't agree with you, then they are spouting nonsense!
Dinkum
9:22 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
No, you got it backwards. If someone (like you) is spouting nonsense, I don't agree with them. Don't even give them the time of day.
hfmom
12:32 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Gambling hurts poor people the most. Do we really want extra tax revenue made from the loss of poor people's money?
Dinkum
2:52 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
What data do you have that supports this position?
Raoul Duke
5:00 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Hey, Dinkum: Do you post these comments from your desk at Village Hall, or from home during your three-hour lunch?
Dinkum
5:22 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Hey, Duke, are you the talking dog from Bush's Baked Beans?
Your one chance to contribute something meaningful here and you blew it. Woof.
SouthSide
2:34 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
There's nothing wrong with examining every possibility and every opportunity, as one trustee explained. In fact, there is everything right about doing so. (I'm not a gambler, save for the occasional IL lottery ticket. I'm not opposed to a casino in place of a rundown hotel. I won't go to a casino, regardless of where it is, but I have no problem with there being new job opportunities and revenue in my Home Sweet Homewood. If the shoe fits, Homewood should wear it. I wish the decision makers all the best.)
Wags69
2:41 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I think the casino proposal is wonderful. The location is excellent -- both for Homewood and the State of Illinois. It's not near the residential parts of Homewood or the downtown and it's right after the merger of 80 & 294. I've lived in a city with casino and, even though I don't gamble much, I really enjoyed the opportunity to see entertainers (comedians, bands, etc.) and I knew people who had decent paying jobs as dealers and waitstaff (tips were good). I used to really be down on gambling expansion for many of the reasons people have stated in this discussion but my experience has led me to believe that most of the reservations are unfounded.
June Whitehand
3:54 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
The thought of high end entertainment coming into the village is a positive aspect.
Dinkum
2:58 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
You may have noticed I've made comments and asked questions about this topic. I have no opinion on the viability or impact of a casino in our backyard. The reason? I've done no homework.
The only thing I know for sure is state government should stay out of the gambling regulation business (and regulation of business in general). Let private business decide where they want to invest for profitable returns.
Blackhawks Fan
5:56 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Dinkum ~ If you have no opinion or have done no homework why do you think it is necessary to question everyone else? Maybe you should do some research and actually come up with some viable information. As far as why the Hofeld and the village board voted against gambling in 1996 it was because they wanted to send a message to other communities that they didn’t believe in gambling or that it would help the south suburbs, and yes I did attend that meeting.
Dinkum
6:43 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
A fair question BH Fan. And I do miss the BH.
I think you know why. Unlike most, I don't believe having an opinion on something (or everything it seems) has any real value. Now, an informed, thoughtful, researched position is a different matter. This deserves respect, consideration, and maybe even a response in kind.
And now to your request. Viable information. Find the paper "Casinos and crimes in the USA" by Douglas M. Walker. I'm not going to quote anything here because a high percentage of Path posters only want to continue believing what they already believe. For them, data and research means little especially if it challenges their beliefs.
Phillip R Baggs
3:28 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/10/30/studies-casinos-bring-jobs-but-also-crime-bankruptcy-and-even-suicide/
Phillip R Baggs
3:30 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/NW-Ind-mayor-wants-2-inland-casinos-for-region-4074104.php
Phillip R Baggs
3:31 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
http://www.freep.com/article/20120304/NEWS06/203040480/22-new-Michigan-casinos-planned-but-success-isn-t-a-sure-bet
Phillip R Baggs
3:36 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Take a lesson from AK-SAR-BEN. It is simply a matter of supply and demand. We should learn from history and do the opposite of Dwight Welch. You can thank me for avoiding those consulting fees later and just send me a check for half. http://articles.latimes.com/1994-07-24/sports/sp-19356_1_aksarben-races
Dinkum
6:45 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Your reference list is incomplete. Find the paper "Casinos and crimes in the USA" by Douglas M. Walker.
Nate Olson
3:40 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I must admit I do not have enough information to form an educated opinion on the topic. Hopefully Patch or another local media outlet will do an article looking maybe at other similar communities that have gotten casinos in the last 10 years. I'd be curious to see what Des Plaines residents have to say particularly. I agree there are definitely a lot of potential negatives such as crime and just the negative stigma the community of Homewood could get by having one. There are positives though with the added revenue and the jobs it would bring, but is that enough to offset the negatives? It doesn't sound like that piece of property is suitable for much else, and my concern would be that even if Homewood says no, couldn't Hazel Crest still move forward and still put one up on just their land? Or Harvey right across 80? Then we would still get all the negatives (crime etc) with none of the revenue positives. I could go either way on this one so I look forward to hearing everyone's constructive opinions and hopefully some hard facts from other similar communities.
Phillip R Baggs
3:50 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Go throw a bag full of $1 bills out your window while driving down 159th and your questions will be answered.
Dinkum
6:27 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Well, you didn't get a constructive opinion from the Baggs man.
Homewood Girl
3:52 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I think that they should put a gym or a resturant or something other than a casino.
Raoul Duke
5:17 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
bpassive: It's not up to the critics of a casino to "see what you can do" to develop the land. It's not up to the village idiots, either. It's private property with a private owner. It's the owner's land. It's the owner's problem. Period.
These "economic development" schemes never, ever work out for the taxpayers. The costs to the taxpayers always outweigh the benefits, if any. The jobs that are created, if any, are for minimum wage. Usually the new, tax-subsidized business drives established community (and tax-paying) businesses out of business.
What kind of TIF subsidies will this nightmare require? How much additional police protection? Ambulance calls to scoop up old ladies who keel over next to the slot machines?
Ask anyone in Bridgeview about Toyota Park and the marvelous benefit that it has been to the community.
lala
5:15 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Downtown Joliet and the whole city of Joliet have reaped the benefits of casinos. The casino's sponsor many events throughout the year as well. A once bleak downtown area is now bustling with upscale dining and shops. Think of the jobs a casino will bring in! The residents of Homewood will benefit from the tax revenue. The casinos have strict security measures in place too. With the extra tax dollars, your town can hire more police if needed. Heck Harrah's in Joliet recently opened a Paul Dean's. Maybe you people should get your questions and fears together and attend the village board meetings for answers. Wouldn't you rather see residents spend money in Homewood rather than drive to Joliet, Aurora or Indiana?
Blackhawks Fan
5:43 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Lala ~ Have you been to Joilet the past five years? I’ve been there many times and the downtown area is a ghost town at night. The area around the Amtrak station is creepy at best.
I noticed you are saying “your town” maybe you should worry about your own town and not tell us what we should think or how we should deal with this.
lala
8:52 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Yes. I was at the Rialto in Oct. to see Cheech & Chong and ate dinner at Harrah's. Like downtown Homewood is hopping every night too and there are no creepy areas? Ever been around after Lassen's closes? Not too much hopping going on after last call. The Jewel and K-Mart parking lots on Halsted can be creepy too. This link will show you some of the benefits: http://www.illinoiscasinogaming.org/impact_files/harrah-joliet.htm
"Your" is merely a typo...neighbor. Everyone is entitled to their opinion on this matter regardless of where they live. It impacts all the surrounding towns. No need to be condescending.
Phillip R Baggs
2:32 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
I guess we better pay more attention the next time Homewood buys property...
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-10-03/news/ct-tl-1004-homewood-property-20121003_1_vacant-properties-village-board-homewood-plans
BUTCH
9:22 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
The site selected for the Casino 30 some years ago was noted for it's thoroughbred and later Harness racing. Jobs were plenty at the track and around it part and full time, and there was no serious crime and or make believe problems,a few years ago the same hysteria was being waged when a off track parlor was opened where Bagio's is now and closed because of a bad location for off track and decline in racing nationwide.
The same protestors concerns on schools and boogeymen, exact same hysteria and hand wringing by the phonies of Homewodd.
A Casino on Halsted would be like hitting the lotto for the 2 towns, this has location and the best Police Dept in the So burbs which will be bigger and better with the needed revenue and like Joliet will have the resources to rebuild a aging infrastructure and add new great ideas, remember the abandoned plans for new housing at G-L BANK downtown back in the BUSH years?
Wake up Homewood the water rates are going to keep climbing what other Business will bring this scale of jobs and resources so badly needed to your village? Who in this time will settle in Homewood due to the rising costs and demand for water in a time of drought and low lake levels especially.
The Mayors and council who have proposed this should be honored, can u imagine what Dwight Welch would do with a location on 1-80-294 & Halsted?
What a bunch of rhubarbs and phonies these new HOMEWODD people are!
Karen V. Maurer
9:02 am on Friday, November 30, 2012
Ryan, I attended the Village Board meeting as an observer for the HF Area League of Women Voters. Thank you for a fair and accurate article. Karen Maurer
Karen V. Maurer
9:03 am on Friday, November 30, 2012
I am a member/reader of Patch. See my comment above and submit it. Thank you.
BUTCH
9:20 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012
Back in the day Homewood was a largely blue collar town that was recovering like everywhere from WWII and KOREA the golden age of thoroughbred racing featured a match race of two of the most outstanding horses of racing at WASHINGTON PARK the site of the casino, people back then were realistic and did not act like the moral majority the puritans on this Blog think they with their concerned voters and usual anti progress all of it based on fear mongering and false equivalency such as TOYOTA PARK and Bridge view and HW - Casino, make a real comparison between Joliet s Casinos and this one been made, Joliet has rebuilt their infrastructure and downtown, built a Baseball Stadium refurbished the Rialto Theater and upgraded their Municipal offices and Courts for starters and none of the jobs the Casino's created were the usual misinfo on min wage, the Casinos did not drive a single established businesses out but brought more in with decent paying jobs as well, stop the hoity- toidy nonsense it is all a anti progress agenda, this town is no longer in a position to attract more big box stores or gymnasiums or even restaurants the last two on 175th are gone for good the added police concerns are real and will be more so if this village does nothing and watches this property decay as the Glen wood mall down the street has do you serious think there are potential developers lining up to create some new mall or restaurant or gymnasium on this PROPERTY?