What Will Illinois Lose in the Sequester?
The state might take a crippling hit if congress does not act before Friday.
Deep, nationwide cuts are geared to take place March 1. They're the first of a decade-long $1.2 trillon budget cut plan poised to go into effect unless Congress can compromise on a deficit-reduction plan.
Here’s what Illinois stands to lose, according to the White House:
- Teachers and Schools: Illinois will lose approximately $33.4 million in funding for primary and secondary education, putting around 460 teacher and aide jobs at risk. In addition about 39,000 fewer students would be served and approximately120 fewer schools would receive funding.
- Education for Children with Disabilities: In addition, Illinois will lose approximately $24.7 million in funds for about 300 teachers, aides, and staff who help children with disabilities.
- Work-Study Jobs: Around 3,280 fewer low income students in Illinois would receive aid to help them finance the costs of college and around 2,650 fewer students will get work-study jobs that help them pay for college.
- Head Start: Head Start and Early Head Start services would be eliminated for approximately 2,700 children in Illinois, reducing access to critical early education.
- Military Readiness: In Illinois, approximately 14,000 civilian Department of Defense employees would be furloughed, reducing gross pay by around $83.5 million in total.
- Army: Base operation funding would be cut by about $19 million in Illinois.
- Air Force: Funding for Air Force operations in Illinois would be cut by about $7 million.
- Navy: Four planned Naval Station Great Lakes demolition projects ($2 million) could be canceled and a scheduled Blue Angels show in Rockford could be canceled.
- Law Enforcement and Public Safety Funds for Crime Prevention and Prosecution: Illinois will lose about $587,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, prosecution and courts, crime prevention and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness initiatives.
- Vaccines for Children: In Illinois around 5,230 fewer children will receive vaccines for diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, whooping cough, influenza, and Hepatitis B due to reduced funding for vaccinations of about $357,000.
- Public Health: Illinois will lose approximately $968,000 in funds to help upgrade its ability to respond to public health threats including infectious diseases, natural disasters, and biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological events. In addition, Illinois will lose about $3.5 million in grants to help prevent and treat substance abuse, resulting in around 3,900 fewer admissions to substance abuse programs. And the Illinois State Department of Public Health will lose about $186,000 resulting in around 4,600 fewer HIV tests.
- STOP Violence Against Women Program: Illinois could lose up to $273,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 1,000 fewer victims being served.
Aksum01
4:05 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
How in the world did the Federal government ever get so heavily involved in most of these to begin with? I say, go for it. When we're actually without necessary and essential services, we'll decide better what to put back in.
Cancelling an air show has nothing to do with Military Readiness and vice versa.
David Vancina
7:08 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I was wondering the same thing! This sequester thing is interesting -- the Dems and Repubs agreed to a game of chicken, and they're both losing! I think the taxpayers may actually win for once, at least a little.
New Lenox Mom
5:49 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
WOW Aksum01 you are one oblivious naive individual! Please make sure should you have a fire in your home, do not call your local fire department! Stupid is as stupid does....and if you have children, remove them from public schools and pay for private school.
Aksum01
7:09 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Speaking of WOW, you made my point without even trying...but didn't actually answer my question
David Vancina
7:11 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I could be wrong, but I don't think the fire department receives federal funds. (And if it does, Aksum01's question still stands.)
Just Me
6:32 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Wow Nl Mom, they are just using scare tactics and your falling for it. The govt is too big and needs to be downsized, we can't afford it anymore
Nathan Elias
9:06 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Interesting that you say that.
All of these teachers jobs/ education aid/ vaccine aid etc come out of our and corporate entity taxes. The government is directly involved in turning our tax dollars (if we want to be technical, also our loans from other countries) into these ESSENTIAL services. Even with this, Educators still are not being paid enough for doing probably the most important job in our society! If we can't afford a government, as threadbare as ours is looking into becoming, how are we going to afford to 'do it ourselves'?
JMC
8:03 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Instead of making cuts that harm children and education... why not cut even a portion of the billions we give out in corporate welfare?! - Start with the oil companies!!!
Aksum01
8:38 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
We're (as in we the people of course) giving your tax money to oil companies? Or,worse yet, borrowing it from the Chinese to give to the oil companies. Now that would be stupid (thanks NLM). When did that happen? Where does a Gump like me go to check that out?
The Truth
8:45 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
How about starting with the abundance of "cash only" businesses in Chicago and make them pay taxes on the MILLIONS they rake in. Their politics aren't working either. This way you're children might have better schools and no risk of getting violently harmed while walking to them.
Think locally. Worry more about the dead bodies that float up on your lakefront once a month rather than oil slicks and being jealous of "suit and coat" people.
James Boskey
8:56 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Aksum01 is spot on. Of all listed cuts, military is the only one that should be the federal governments responsibilty, and I'm quite sure it has become somewhat bloated since Washington crossed the Deleware. All of the rest should be handled locally, without us sending our money to the useless politicians in D.C.
Mokena Man
9:17 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
It's time to cut spending
We can't go on with an open check book.
97 billion in debt for pension alone
The Truth
8:51 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
You're absolutely right. More red-light cameras coming right up. You can run them all you like as long as you pay the tickets as they don't show on your driving record anyway. Lakefront liberals sliding under buses in January while riding their bikes to work thought the cameras were for "safety".
Rob Peter to pay pensions.
bserius
7:28 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
SEQUESTER THIS,!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cut all the perks, expense accounts , cars, staffs , of ALL THE ELECTED AND APPOINTED government employees first,,, Cut all the pensions of all the ELECTED legislators for life politicians,,,,,
Dianna
8:15 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Absolutely bserius. That is exactly where the cuts should begin. Tomorrow.. no Today !
Mike
8:41 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
$83billion! Big deal! What we need is less fed govt in our lives. Education will not suffer. The fed has one good law regarding ed, PL 94-142. It's been around since the 70's and it assures the education of special need students k-12. That's great, we need to help these kids. The the other intrusions by the feds into k-12 ed are gifts to the unions. All public ed k-12 should be run locally with local money and state aide as defined by IL Const. The reason why the feds are involved in local ed is simply because the urban areas of our once great nation cannot educate their undisciplined youth. Sorry Chicago and you other lousy cities, educate your own and leave the rest of us alone. As far as the Sequester is concerned, Repubs don't cave. Obama goes golfing, his family goes vacationing, the feds keep spending and borrowing, the Senate hasn't passed a budget in 4 years, the poor hate the rich, the blacks hate the whites, the employees hate the employers, blah blah blah. Aren't we all sick of it? Govt close the borders, protect from our enemies and help those Americans through no fault of their own need some assistance. As for the rest of us, get out of our lives.
Nathan Elias
9:15 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
That is the most inane anything I've ever seen someone post. (Well except kids on youtube). We are a global (read national) community. You have one opinion on a law regarding mentally handicapped students- and you say this is a good federal law: To help those less fortunate than us who need OUR COLLECTIVE ASSISTANCE. Yet when it comes to areas where people aren't mentally handicapped but are socio-economically handicapped (severely) you say 'to hell with them?' As if there is some 'moral' and 'integrity' based difference in the hearts of other men different form yours. You happened to grow up, or grew up with good parents, in a good town. Your environment has defined you. People without the access to good environments need more help to get to a point where they can spout ignorant horseshit on the internet. Thats why our entire NATION pulls together to fund helpful programs in 'lost' communities. To make our country, our world, stronger. These people need our government, because through no fault of their own, they need some assistance; it is incredibly difficult to make it out of a bad situation, or one where your education is compromised.
I genuinely cringe to see this posted on the Frankfort patch, supposedly a community of highly educated men and women with access to excellent services a strong school system and an area of economic growth that stands as an anomaly to virtually every township and suburb surrounding it.
Just Me
7:06 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Nathan, all of the things you list sound wonderful, they really do but, it's un-realistic and the people with good educations, and decent neighborhoods can not afford to keep paying, some of us are broke and cutting corners ourselves. Why can't the goverment and the broke people do the same. Give up the obama phones and steak dinners on my dime! Limit welfare to a few years and not a lifetime... these are the changes that need to be made. Teach a man to fish.....
Rolan
4:36 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
@Just Me (and anyone who may be under-educated about "welfare"): I really encourage you to learn the facts about welfare: what programs exist, who is eligible, the time limits that are in place, the work requirements in place, and who is actually on "welfare." It is not as easy as you might think to participate in all of the programs, and there are time limits for some of them.
Admittedly, there is waste in the programs. But there is waste in all levels of government, so why try to make cuts here first? I guess the problem for a lot of folks is the idea of working hard and then supporting someone who is not willing to work hard, but would rather just loaf. I understand that sense of unfairness, but I think it is misguided for two reasons. First, I think the poor are blamed for being poor, and being poor is associated with being lazy. The truth about poverty is not so simple. Second, welfare doesn't support most people entirely. Cash benefits are limited, and food stamps can only be used for food. A phone might be helpful, but you can't live on a phone. The programs are designed to provide assistance, not sustenance. People on "welfare" still pay sales taxes too, and in some cases income taxes.
So we are not in actuality supporting people who don't want to work. We are assisting people while they find work or while they are in a tight spot. Let's make cuts in places where it won't hurt the vulnerable adults and children in our society.
SmartMan5
10:37 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
I am just happy the federal government is finally cutting. It is to bad that it has to be done this way instead of working together to determine the best places to cut with the least amount of impact (pork barrel funding such as was in the fiscal cliff deal). Although I can see right through President Obama's claim that the sky is falling and it is not his fault, he does seem to be appealing to the public opinion. His strategy of sticking with the “fairness” theme throughout his 4 years is brilliant. The Republican's better figure out a way to change the perception he has created that they only represent the elitist.
Jason Brennan
11:56 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
It's god they're cutting expenses, it's too bad they're cutting the things they are. I agree with some of the other opinions though, the state of IL should be able to support itself. We've got to get on a budget and stay on it. Il has far too large of a tax base for me to believe that we need Fed. assistance on many things, if any. If anything, some of our tax dollars should be going to help lesser fortunate states with REAL poor people, and not so many people who really could do a job but don't want to. I wonder how much misspent welfare money there is out there that could be used to help pay for schools, etc. instead? I don't know, but my gut tells me it's a LOT.
Aksum01
12:40 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Some obviously have their heart in the right place, aspiring to that lofty but elusive ideal of having an equal outcome for everyone in the world. I’m with you. But do you honestly believe that our Federal government is the way to achieve it? By the time a politician reaches the Federal level, he or she has corrupted every ideal they have ever run for office on, if they have ever had anything other than narcissistic self-interest as their ideal to begin with.
Here’s what I see: you send your tax buck to the Feds, you get back 25 cents in services and 50 cents of debt that will never be repaid, and you’re still short 25 cents. It doesn’t take too much edumacation to figure out that doesn’t work, unless you went to [school name withheld]. There are some things that the Federal government can and should do (constitutionally), but personally, I don’t think that equal outcomes for the world is one of them. You’re gonna have to go for a much larger revolution than the one we base our current government on.
I refer back to the original question at the beginning of this thread.
Jack
12:57 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
A quote from former President Truman,
It's a recession when your neighbours out of a job,
its a depression when you're out of a job.
BUTCH
1:27 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
The origins of Big spending and deficits as Cheney said " Reagan proved Deficits do not matter" and now after he and his co POTUS looted the treasury for the Cayman islanders we are going through the motions but all that is going on is we are being held hostage by the do nothing representatives of the same Cayman islanders who could care less due to gerrymandering their errand boys are safe it is called a lack of accountability. The loop holes in the tax laws will continue as will more suffering for those who can least afford it, the tax avoider flag wavers may not even have any more parades for the returning troops from the poppy fields because they may ask for more help in the PTSD or exposure to Uranium depleted ammo.That will be the end of the wing nut ideologues concerns and will not even mention Obamacare again, the for profit system that is working for the Ins and Pharmas has now been also working for the tax payers but nothing is in the media and in a more perfect world we would have been doing part E MEDICARE for ALL that would save more BILLIONS for the taxpayers.
Joe
9:30 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Thank god for Obama! Not.
The Truth
8:38 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
That expression on your savior's face is priceless!
Paul60657
10:40 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Sadly, no none is asking why the lawmakers aren't being hit in their pocketbooks (like withholding ALL pay starting midnight tonite until a deal is struck), removing any guards they might have, taking away ALL government cars (let them use their own), all government issued credit cards frozen, yada, yada.
BUTCH
1:51 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
if they did that Paul the POTUS would do what he could a done since the deal was struck get rid of it! EVERYONE is full of it!
JMC
9:20 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
So, let me get this straight... LESS than 3% of our taxes go towards helping children, the disabled, and poor survive- but you want to vomit out the ignorant factually unsound cliches complaining about that, RATHER than educate yourself on the FACTS concerning all of the businesses that receive literally BILLIONS of our tax dollars in corporate welfare ..?! How anyone can want to purposefully do more damage to those in need, when THEY did NOT cause this deficit, is beyond comprehension to those of us rationally minded people who want real solutions founded on logic and fact!
Jason Brennan
7:05 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
We need to make cuts almost everywhere, there is too much waste almost everywhere. The only reason I made the comment about the abuse of the welfare system is because I've witnessed so much of it personally, that's all. When I go to the donut shop and the liquor store and see "link card accepted here" signs up, it kind of concerns me that this may not be the kind of "food" that these people really need, that's all, and when I have them offering to sell me these cards for a percentage of their value, and they are doing so on the streets wearing a higher value in clothing and teeth than my entire mortgage for 2 months, that kind of annoys me too. It's this kind of waste that I would like to see stop. It may be a small amount as a percentage of the entire waste but it bothers and probably affects my morale the most, I'd say. It also isn't fair to the people who really need welfare to allow this to happen. They could probably have a better chance to improve themselves if they didn't have to share all the welfare with these other abusive people.